31739707384

How Tumblr’s unique lack of status signaling helps the little guy

The Daily Dot has a post today about how to succeed on Tumblr.

One of its tips was, “Fake it ‘til you make it.”

“For all I know, and for all anyone else knows, you are next level.”

- Christopher Price, Tumblr staff

They let the point stand on its own, but left out a really big reason why this is more true on Tumblr than other social sites. On Tumblr, your friends/follower count is not displayed. Sure, some themes show a preview of Tumblrs you follow. But not how many follow you. This means whenever you interact with somebody (by reblogging them, following them, Liking their stuff…), and they check you out, they have to judge you by the content of your character blog. (Same goes for you. You can’t just skim a Tumblr and say, “Hey. Is this person important?” Nope. You gotta actually think.)

This is really cool and leads to some unique dynamics not found on other sites. This is not to say I think all social sites should be this way. Just that it’s rare, and we can enjoy its special vibe.

Get out there and Tumblr like the superstar nobody knows you aren’t.

/via dailydot:

8 pro tips for Tumblr stardom

It literally takes seconds to create a Tumblr blog.

A few keystrokes and mouse clicks, and suddenly you’re thrust into a world full of GIFs, memes, and single-serving blogs vying for the Web’s attention. But with 72 million blogs on Tumblr, how do you stand out and develop an audience?

To find out, the Daily Dot turned to a panel of experts who have developed a standard of excellence on Tumblr in regards to original art, GIF animations, Internet culture, and personal branding: Benjamin Grelle (The Frogman), Amanda Brennan (Know Your Meme), Shane Burcaw (Laughing at My Nightmare), Jimmy Repeat and Mark Portillo (Mr. GIF), Christopher Price (Topherchris) and Lee Rubenstein (EatSleepDraw)

(continue)

27697403201

Your Facebook marketing investment’s Law of Diminishing Returns

(Just capturing some tweets I made on the subject. There was a bit of a response on Twitter, and I don’t want to lose these notes to the Twitter memory hole. Fully fleshed-out blog post/theory coming.) 

If you like getting all X-Files about social media, you should probs get on the mailing-list, so you don’t miss important stuff.

25862168113

Am I crazy, or is finding good LinkedIn Groups is the worst?

I’ll be honest- I haven’t really been taking LinkedIn seriously. I’ll spare you my grand theory of why all symmetric-relationship social networks (Like LinkedIn and Facebook) are way less interesting- that’s beyond the scope of this post. But I will say among people I know, way more professional opportunities and networking events have come through sites like Twitter. (To say nothing of non-professional stuff like art, news, etc.)

But recently I’ve been debating/discussing LinkedIn with some folk who have been bugging me to give it a really fair shot. So I am. I caught up on some “connections,” took the summary seriously, etc. #itsaprocess.

After I fulfilled all the symmetric obligations and supplied my structured data, I immediately licked my chops for good old unstructured discovery. You know- the stuff that makes twitter, tumblr, and pinterest so serendipitous.

This led me to LinkedIn Groups. If you’re reading this I probably know you from my geek (data science, python, ruby), seo, or advertising circles. I went looking for pretty much anything that fit into those areas. Honestly, I didn’t expect to find that much good geek stuff. If anybody has a lock on highly-developed, topic specific discussion areas, it’s geeks. We’ve got so many great watering holes (stuff like the StackExchange empire, sub-Reddits, Hacker News…), that I wasn’t surprised to find LinkedIn geek groups mostly populated by desperate recruiters. But even for other topics, LinkedIn Groups look pretty bleak. Many are ghost towns. And when you filter for activity/recent postings, there’s just a lot of “FIRST!” types of link posting with no commentary/interactions.

Can somebody tell me I have this wrong? Is it an open secret that you’re not really supposed to use LinkedIn Groups? Or are we supposed to find out about the good groups *off* the site? Do you have any favorite LinkedIn Groups? How did you find them?

Is my main problem that I’m trying to use LinkedIn for discovery/sharing/teaching/learning, when other people use it just for resume stalking?